Try it free

Accuracy benchmark

Last run: July 2026 · Reproducible from our eval harness

Most "AI document extraction" accuracy claims are unverifiable. Ours isn't: we test against rent rolls filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission — public documents anyone can check — and publish exactly what we measured.

6/6
documents passed
95/95
fields exactly correct
100%
field accuracy

Methodology

Per-document results

DocumentTypeSource filingResult
Hartman portfolio rent roll (2018)Multi-property tenant-level rent roll, 8-K loan exhibitSEC 0001446687-18-000051PASS
Uptown Tower rent roll (2013)Office unit/tenant rent roll, 8-K loan scheduleSEC 0000928953-16-000005PASS
Woolworth Building tenantsTenant-level table from underwritten rent roll, CMBS prospectusSEC 0000950136-05-003719PASS
Mazza GrandMarc unit mixStudent housing (232 units) unit-mix summary, CMBS prospectusSEC 0001539497-13-001242PASS
Luxe at 1548 unit mixMultifamily (54 units) unit-mix summary, CMBS prospectusSEC 0001539497-15-001777PASS
Granada Gardens unit mixMultifamily (940 units) unit-mix summary, CMBS prospectusSEC 0001539497-14-001559PASS

What this does and doesn't claim

This benchmark shows exact-match performance on real, messy, public rent-roll documents — including OCR-degraded source text (one document literally spells "LIFESTYLES" as "LJFESTYLES"; we extract what's printed, faithfully). It does not claim every possible document will extract perfectly. That's why every extraction ships with a verification report: recomputed totals reconciled against stated totals, and any value the model can't read with confidence is flagged, never guessed. You always know which fields to double-check.

The corpus grows over time. Want your (anonymized) document format represented? Send it over.

Try it on your own rent roll — 3 free